News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Wrong targets 

Wrong targets

04 Jun, 2008 09:18 AM
IT looked like a scene from the Australian film classic The Castle.

Salt-of-the-earth families and upset pensioners were gathered in Mulga Place, Macquarie Fields, last week to make a stand to protect their homes.

They have been informed by the State Government that their public housing, where many of them have lived for three decades, will be sold from under them – if they can’t afford to buy them.

It is part of a plan to reinvent the image of a suburb tarnished by the infamous 2005 riots and other social problems.

But these tenants want to know why the Government is targeting their peaceful, well-kept streets, and not the suburb’s uglier trouble spots instead.

The state MP for Macquarie Fields, Andrew McDonald, agrees and has already gone in to bat for them with the Housing Minister Matt Brown.

‘‘They’re selling the wrong houses – that’s the bottom line,’’ Dr McDonald told the Advertiser.

‘‘They are the people who are the solution, not the problem.

‘‘They are going to be part of the community that we want to create – a viable society has all ages.

‘‘I’ve spoken to the minister and said: ‘Matt, this is all about flexibility’.’’

Some residents in Mulga Place and its surrounds have lived in the same house for more than 30 years, adding improvements and making their houses ‘‘a home’’.

But they have been told that their street is one of the first to go as the Housing Department sells public houses to create a mix of public and private.

Carol and Frank Montgomery have lived in the same house for 31 years, and described the news as devastating.

‘‘Because it’s the gateway to the estate they are using the best homes to entice people into the estate,’’ she said.

‘‘This piece of area is the good people and good homes.

‘‘It would be more viable to leave the people there that they know have stable incomes – the other high turnover places are in and out within six months. Why not sell those?’’

About 15 residents filled the Montgomerys’ living room to tell of similar stories of attachment to their homes.

They likened their battle to Darryl Kerrigan’s in The Castle.

One family had recently installed $4000 worth of tiles for a daughter with an allergy, a man had scattered his wife’s ashes in the backyard, another had spent 20 years

developing his garden.

Many residents said it felt like they were being punished for taking care of their homes.

Housing Minister Matt Brown said residents who wanted to buy their houses could do so.

None of the Mulga Place residents said they could afford to do so, as they are mostly pensioners or about to retire.

State MP Dr Andrew McDonald said he had visited several concerned residents to make representations

to the minister.

When the Advertiser contacted the office of Housing Minister Matt Brown, he said the whole purpose was to strengthen – not weaken – the community.

‘‘I’m open to discussions on ways to achieve this – the door is always open,’’ he said.

‘‘Andrew McDonald is representing the views of the community, I do understand and appreciate how this can be unsettling but a vibrant community needs to have a mix of both public and private.

‘‘We’ve had advice from my advisory board as to which houses would be appropriate to sell.’’

A Housing Department spokesman said the suburb aimed to be 50 per cent private within 20 years.

‘‘These properties have been chosen as they present the best areas to establish a market for housing on the estate and as a way to achieve sales in the longer term

across the estate,’’ he said.

‘‘At this stage it’s believed most families will be able to stay in Macquarie Fields if they wish.

‘‘Sales are not expected to start until early next year and affected tenants will be given at least six months notice prior to the sale of their home.’

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well Done to the Housing Minister Matt Brown Your doing a great job but i believe you need to put all the house's on the maket and sell them including Mac-Fields , Claymore , Ambervale , Rosemedow , Glenfield and relocate these people in land (country) were they can behave like animals and have there riots and other social problems .
Posted by Working Class, 4/06/2008 4:13:24 PM
Excuse you workin class man. I have lived in Macquarie Fields Housing Commission all my life with my single mother and four siblings. No one in my family, or my neighbours, or my friends are animals. It's unfortunate that your mind is so sheltered and cannot see the misfortune that some families suffer and can only judge ALL Housing Commission tenants due to how the news portrayed the riots. Pull your head out of your rear. Housing Commission is great assistance to struggling families, yes it's true that some people take advantage of the scheme but that is only a hand full of tenants. You cannot punish the whole classroom for one misbehaved child.
Posted by Proud, 6/06/2008 1:06:58 PM
I'm not sure we have the target correct at all, what really concerns me about this story is that there are people living in government housing for 30+ years who have no ambition or intention of trying to get "their own home" they seem to believe (and we encourage this) that this is "their own home" for the duration once they move in. I always believed that this was emergency housing being offered by the community to people who could not provide for themselves. Why have we not provided the framework that allowed and ensured that these families progressed beyond the need for government housing. I know there are some people (with disabilities for example) for whom it may be impossible to live without assistance and those people should always be supported by the greater community but the idea that a government home belongs to it's tenant is absurd, it belongs to the people! It's tenants should be assisted to find permanent solutions to whatever problems caused them to need help in the first place. To me the target should be getting people out of government housing not allowing them to live there forever.
Posted by Lookingforchange, 6/06/2008 4:16:17 PM
TO WORKING CLASS At least most "houso animals" have a better education than you, we can spell correctly . i should be I maket is market, Rosemedow is Rosemeadow and there riots should be their riots . Hope you do have a job where you need to write English
Posted by I AM NOT AN ANIMAL, 7/06/2008 10:23:39 AM
To Working class.Can I assume you inherited your house from your parents. Assume you are a big lotto winner.Assume you have never had to suffer a disability or accident that put you out of your so called working class. Assume that you live at Blair Athol.But not all residence are drug dealers.Or are they.Working class?.
Posted by Houso Class, 7/06/2008 8:25:12 PM
One very important thing everyone seams to have missed.......The government is a landlord in all this, and as a landlord they have every right to sell there property. They are not kicking any body on to the streets, if the tenants can not afford to buy the property for sale they will actually relocate them at no cost to the tenant.......please give us all a break.............The other point is that no work can be done to the residence without the written permission of the landlord...I wonder how many have written permission to improve the residence. Not that I am a labour supporter but for a change they are trying to do something right and a few individuals have to make it difficult for the greater community.
Posted by Landlord, 10/06/2008 8:33:22 AM
To Landlord.You and Working class should get together you deserve each other.You sound like the landlord from hell.you should work for D.O.H.You could stop tenants from caring about their houses.Not a labour supporter.Excuse me while I
Posted by Houso Class, 10/06/2008 8:57:00 PM
While I do agree that the wrong houses are being sold, I also have an issue with the tenants sense of entitlement. They've been there 30+ years - you can't tell me that they could not have purchased those properties while they were worth next to nothing. Additionally, the government was letting existing tenants buy them at significantly reduced prices. The fact that there are so many of such tenants suggests complacency rather than pure disadvantage. Public housing is emergency housing, not an entitlement for life. Having said that, there are certainly some tenants in that suburb that should be removed ahead of those in Mulga Place.
Posted by Interested, 2/05/2010 11:41:34 PM, on Campbelltown - Macarthur Advertiser

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Not happy, minister: Residents of Macquarie Fields Mulga Place are upset their neat homes are the first chosen by Housing Minister Matt Brown to be sold. Frank and Carol Montgomery and Barry Crossley, pictured at front, are among those determined to be heard. Picture: Jeff McGill
Not happy, minister: Residents of Macquarie Fields Mulga Place are upset their neat homes are the first chosen by Housing Minister Matt Brown to be sold. Frank and Carol Montgomery and Barry Crossley, pictured at front, are among those determined to be heard. Picture: Jeff McGill
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

RPI Production
1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

minto pets
 


Campbelltown - Macarthur Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...