News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Council's fury at State mini-budget 

Council's fury at State mini-budget

26 Nov, 2008 09:09 AM
A BELEAGUERED Campbelltown Council threatened

to pull all involvement with the State Government's growth area plan last week during a council meeting dominated by anger at the NSW mini-budget.

Much of the anger came from Labor councillors, as well as the Liberals.

But the council eventually decided it would be more constructive to maintain its ``good'' relationship with the Department of Planning, which is looking to Campbelltown to absorb some of Sydney's expanding population but with no promise of providing adequate transport infrastructure. The council will lobby the State Government to keep infrastructure provision in line with growth.

The privatisation of Picton's Queen Victoria Memorial Home and WSN Environmental Solutions, the sale of 140 hectares of Hurlstone Agricultural High School land and the deferral of the South West Rail Link are included in the mini-budget and drawn council anger.

Liberal councillor Jai Rowell has slammed the ``Team Macarthur'' Labor MPs, spurred by Wollondilly MP Phil Costa's comment that the region was given a reprieve in the Government's mini-budget. ``Phil Costa must be so out of touch,'' Cr Rowell said.

Liberal councillor Paul Hawker said that there had not been ``a rustle in the trees'' from the four MPs Mr Costa, Camden's Geoff Corrigan, Campbelltown's Graham West or Macquarie Fields' Andrew McDonald on the mini-budget.

Mr West said no major projects had been stopped in the area. He said the train line had been deferred and the Government was still acquiring land, which showed ``a genuine commitment'' to the project.

A spokesman for Mr Costa, who is also Regional Development Minister, said he understood ``tough decisions have to be made as part of a budget''.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr West's comments appear to highlight the Premier's and The government's ignorance of what is actually proposed for sale. During Question Time on 25/11/08 the Premier stated "the War Memorial is adjacent to the school and will stay with the school" The premier must be going to act out the Skakesperian play "Macbeth" to achieve that promise as an examination of an aerial map (readily available on the web) reveals the forest is separated from the shool by the farm. Also Mr West's comments confirm that a substantial area of the school's playing fields will need to be resumed for railway use. (refer South West Rail Link reports). Further the Glenfield Town Centre plans offers 5 alternate proposals, none of which sugest any more than minimal impact on DET property? Does anybody in the Rees government have any clue as to what they are actually being asked to vote on? Mr Rees needs to adjourn this whole discussion and he and the Treasurer and Education Minister need to fully review the usage and carry out a full cost/benefit study before they make a grave mistake. Adrian Alexander (Class of 61)
Posted by Adrian Alexander (Hurlstone Class of 61), 26/11/2008 10:22:55 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


click here
 
Design an ad 070512
 
Sydney Writers Festival


Campbelltown - Macarthur Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...