News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Car park sparks anger 

Car park sparks anger

04 Nov, 2009 10:00 AM
What do you think about the car park? Comment below.

''ARROGANT'' is how first-home buyer Caroline Ooi described the State Government's response last week to plans for a 450-space commuter car park to be built next to hers and adjoining new houses.

The controversial development is only 60 metres from Mrs Ooi's home in Macarthur Gardens estate and about 450 metres from Macarthur station.

Home-owners feel they were ``lied to'' because they weren't told about it when they bought their dream homes in the Landcom/Stockland's estate near Macarthur Square.

About 200 residents signed a petition in an effort to have the plan overturned but Mrs Ooi said it was simply ``dismissed and laughed at in Parliament''.

Mrs Ooi, who works with people with disabilities, said the car park was not suitable for the elderly or for people in wheelchair.

``It's great that someone [Opposition transport spokeswoman Gladys Berejiklian] finally acknowledges the proposal lie as it states Macarthur commuter car park is 350 metres from the station and acknowledges that it is more in the region of 450 plus,'' she said.

``This will require someone with a disability to make their way over two road crossings with no pedestrian safety afforded.''

Labor MP John Aquilina said in Parliament that the proposed site was the most logical site for the large car park. Mr Aquilina said other potential sites within a 500-metre radius of the station were considered and discounted because they were either zoned for commercial retail uses or were affected by flooding from a local creek.

``The program is a great investment,'' he said. ``It's an investment in improving facilities for the growing number of commuters choosing to use the rail network so there will be disabled car parking next to the station in the 80 spaces to be provided and there will be a safe walking path to it, including a safe crossing of Menangle Road. The Government is proposing a major upgrade to public transport facilities at Macarthur costing more than $50 million. The upgrade includes an additional platform, a bus interchange, accessible lifts and two new commuter car parks not one.''

Mrs Ooi said she didn't believe that an impact study had been conducted for another site and then aborted because of possible flooding.

``This site can only be the land on the University of Western Sydney [Campbelltown] side of the tracks, as it's the only other land site with a creek,'' she said. ``It's funny though that there's no flood survey of the same creek between our homes and the car park due to the Infrastructure Act not requiring it, especially when the creek beside our homes will be used for car park rainwater catchment.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
John Aquilina, Phil Costa and Graham West have betrayed steadfast and loyal Labor supporters and damaged their legacy and brand beyond repair. Just pure politico-spin with neither an ounce of compassion nor conciliation. I am truly ashamed for what they are doing and saying, and they can expect a very hostile reception from former followers and admirers come the March 2011 election.
Posted by JC, 6/11/2009 1:31:53 PM, on Campbelltown - Macarthur Advertiser
The Labor Party are looking after the self-serving interests of Landcom/Stockland who own the land that is supposed to be in the flood prone area. The land in question is also part of Macarthur Gardens. It is on the other side of the railway line near the University of Western Sydney. It would appear that this land is worth more $$ in terms of future housing expansion than Stage 3 in Macarthur Gardens. The fact that this land is constantly referred to as being flood prone washes over the fact that it, like Stage 3 of Macarthur Gardens, was always to be housing. One just needs to view the Macarthur Gardens Master Plan to see both areas were designated for housing. The only difference is that Landcom/Stockland are in consultation with the UWS about university style accomodation there. Ha, flood prone land is ok for housing there! Surely these plans could be moved over to another part of such a large piece of land to accomodate the car park closer to the station for commuters. These despicable people are also ignoring the fact that TIDC have not presented a report for public consultation in relation to the said flood prone land. Where are the plans for public consultation???
Posted by Glenys, 7/11/2009 7:05:04 AM, on Campbelltown - Macarthur Advertiser

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Put it elsewhere: Macarthur Gardens residents are still lobbying the Government over the proposal for a large commuter car park.Picture: Carlos Furtado
Put it elsewhere: Macarthur Gardens residents are still lobbying the Government over the proposal for a large commuter car park.Picture: Carlos Furtado
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
28 October, 2009
21 October, 2009

Most popular articles

RPI Production
1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

minto pets
 


Most Popular


Campbelltown - Macarthur Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...